“We can only know the unknown
when we become unknown ourselves.” (SDG, Message at
Madurai on 30-04-1977, Page-69, 2006 Edition)
Sri. K.C.Narayana
1.
Cogito Ergo Sum so said Descartes. “I think
therefore I am” is what he said. This was his answer
to the argument that there is no proof of existence
for any thing as everything we say we know is only
an idea we have of that thing. He argued that while
all this may be true, we cannot question the
existence of the questioner or we cannot ignore the
existence of the doubter who doubts. Master in his
book Philosophy of Sahaj Marg stated “Now let the
atheist be faced with the question as to what
exists. A consistent agnostic can doubt and deny the
existence of everything but not his own self. Viz.
that which doubts or denies.”(wuf. 11) We thus
through inference seem to know our self. What this
self however remains Unknown.
2.
Master further stated that God does not have
mind and obviously He cannot think. On the face of
it, it is atrocious to say so. God however knows
without the faculty of thinking. That is because He
is everything and is every where. He is all aspects
of all beings. He is not outside but inside and is
not separate from us but one with us. He knows
through being and not perceiving. He is not limited
by the subject, object duality. The limitation of
God (is it blasphemous) is that he cannot perceive.
He knows but does not know that He knows. We provide
Him not just a set of senses but with our capacity
for cognition and cognitive perception well
developed we lend Him with our capacity to question
and understand and reflect. This is because we are
the Homo sapiens sapiens the creatures that do know
that they know.
3.
Because we perceive and gain knowledge we can
never know God and He remains always the Unknown. He
is so intimate that we do not perceive and know Him.
Knowledge is the link between Subject and Object of
perception. But He is neither the Subject nor the
Object of any perception. Thus He remains always
‘the Unknown’ through any mediated or perceptive
knowledge. He is not known through perception,
inference, analogy, Scriptures and advice from
elders. He is to be intuited and imperienced. It is
only when the mind which coordinates and collates
all perceptive data gets totally interiorised and
gets purged out of all the impressions of such
perceptive data and the reflective analysis it has
made of such data, that it gains a status that may
be called purity. It is in a pure mind the flower of
pure love blossoms. All sadhana is aimed at that
only.
4.
We all practice the Natural Path and the
meditation prescribed for us only with the aim of
knowing the Unknown and become one with it. Master
says “We know that God is completely devoid of
grossness, so the realisation of God must mean the
attainment of a state of similar subtleness to the
last possible degree. This is what we aim at in
Natural Path. The system helps an abhyasi free
himself from grossness that has settled round him in
the form of coverings. The technique though quite
simple, is often beyond common grasp, since it
adheres closely to the absolute Reality and proceeds
along subtlest lines. It prescribes meditation on
the heart, supposing the presence of Divine Light
there. But the abhyasi is directed not to try to see
the light in any form or shape. If he does so the
light, if perchance it appears to his view, will not
be the real one but a projection of his mind. An
abhyasi is, however, advised to take it in the form
of mere supposition. In that case it will be the
subtlest, and we shall thereby be meditating upon
the subtlest. Every saint has used the word Light
for it and I too cannot avoid it, since that is the
only expression best suited for the purpose. But
that creates some complications, because when we
talk of light the idea of luminosity becomes
predominant, and we begin to take it as glittering.
The real light carries with it no such sense and may
be represented as 'light without luminosity'. It
refers to the very real substance or, more
appropriately, the substance which is associated
with neither light nor darkness but is beyond both.”
Here in the very technique of meditation we find the
Master eliminating the very process of perceptive
knowledge and is asking us to directly dive into the
Infinite. In fact he is asking us to meditate on the
Unknown- a divine light without luminosity. Those
who are accustomed to accept only the perceptive
knowledge will not find this method agreeable. But
unfortunately the mind with all its notions and
ideas cannot comprehend reality in its true form.
Any change or modification on the procedure given to
us by the Master is bound to lead us to perceptive
knowledge which cannot grant us the Unknown. I may
say reality is so very intimate that we cannot
perceive it and add ‘Do not try to know the Unknown;
be the Unknown’.
5.
We have in the pre-para observed the
importance of following the method of meditation
prescribed without any change. For this we have to
determine ourselves to know the Unknown the only
thing worth knowing. Master blesses us when he said
“I do want that all of you may emerge as the Suns in
the field of Spirituality but it is possible only if
the reflection of the earth is not allowed to be
cast on the sun and this is feasible only if you
work out your orbit accordingly. When can be the
orbit made? Only when you straighten out the
movement. And when will the movement be straight?
When the destination is always in full sight. And
when can the goal remain in sight? When you become
entirely His. When can you be His? When you lose
yourself completely. When can you lose yourself?
When there is no thought in the heart other than
that of His. And when is this possible? Through
practice. How does practice become? By love and
interest. How are love and interest born? By
thinking repeatedly. How repeated thinking becomes
possible? Through determination. And when is it
possible to make a firm determination? Only then,
when you gird up your loins to sacrifice your rest
and pleasures and say good bye to lethargy.” In
short we have to become unknown to our pleasures,
wishes, ideas and notions of things and men. Totally
oblivious to the demands of lower and upper
tendencies of the mind we have to gird up our loins
to know Him and Him alone who is the Unknown. It may
be said ‘be unknown so that you know the unknown.’
There is a bonus here; when we become unknown, the
Unknown knows us and also owns us. But this is a
matter of ones’ imperience. I pray everyone comes to
this stage soon under His guidance.
6.
Knowing the Unknown appears to be
ridiculously impossible for the common perceptive
knowledge. We are sure we have a direct imperience
of the Unknown but rational mind demands to have the
criteria of certainty about the same. The Law of
precedence is an accepted law of certainty and the
legal systems of every Nation has its base on that.
We are not only the ones who have such imperience.
Dr. K.C.V. says “There are several mystics who
experience themselves as losing themselves once and
for all time, utterly in a vast Universal
Consciousness indistinguishably like rivers in an
ocean, or like a light that merges in an
illumination million times brighter than itself.
There is a sense of dissolution of oneself in a
Nihil or Supracosmic impersonal Being, a dissolution
which thereafter compels the utter giving up of all
distinctions and differences between itself and
others. Indeed it may be that he experiences none of
these and least of all himself. One ceases.” But the
path trodden by them is literally the path of the
Unknown. It was a few years back I got to read a
book called ‘On having no head’. The author was
eloquently arguing that we do not have any knowledge
of our own head except perhaps the tip of the nose
and was narrating his appreciation of his Zen
master. On some thinking over the theme I found that
the least we know of our body is our back.
Surprisingly all the Chakras are located on the
spine and all the mystics and others tried to know
the Unknown through these relatively unknown body
energy centres. We are saved of this exercise by the
Master who gave us the excellent method of practice
of Pranahuti Aided Meditation.
7.
Master asserts “Consciously, the inner
craving of a human heart is the attainment of the
Real. This is the ladder for one to ascend towards
the Unknown. When this craving is satisfied we also
become unknown to ourselves. We thus enter a state
of oblivion where self is totally forgotten, and the
Consciousness of the body or the soul is all gone.
The impressions of existence which encumber the
heart are all washed away. One cannot imagine what
he is or what others are. The tie of relationship is
broken, and he does not feel himself connected with
anybody. In short he loses his very entity. He does
things which leave no impression upon him. The
formation of samskaras stops, and he is free from
their effect. He thus acquires the state of nishkam
karma, so beautifully discussed by Lord Krishna in
the Gita. At this stage the man attains an almost
balanced state similar to that which prevailed
before the creation came into existence. His heart
is quite calm, and mind disciplined. He is so much
absorbed in Brahm that he does not like to part with
it even for a moment. So he can no longer meditate
either on God or on himself. If, however, he
attempts to meditate for a while, breathlessness
will follow, since he is swimming in the sphere
where there is no density. ( This is a matter of
personal experience of many aspirants- KCN) At this
stage they say that self is realised; but that is a
wrong impression because there (the stage of self
realisation- KCN) one knows what he is, and this is
what they lay so much stress upon. What happens at
the stage (stage of absorption in Brahm- KCN) is
that the cells of the body begin to get transformed
into energy and then finally into its ultimate.
There is no charm, no attraction and no anandam (in
the popular sense of the word). It is a tasteless
state, unchanging and constant. It can more
appropriately be described as `sang-e-benamak' - a
lump of salt stone from which saltishness has been
taken away. (State of Realisation)
8.
The topic of the seminar is a very
illuminating sentence taken from the Masters’
message which is very poetical viz. "We can only
know the unknown when we become unknown ourselves."
Identity card which almost every one has is the sure
sign of ones’ existence in modern days. When an
aspirant asked the Master for his address instead of
pulling out his address or identity card he said “in
the scriptural language I might say ‘My address
shall be known to you when you have realised
yourself.’ But I shall prefer to reply as “when you
become only my self”. That means you must begin
seeing me in you automatically, not purposely, or
when the very same condition gets created in you,
then alone shall you be able to know my real
address.” That is our identity shall cease. This
identity crisis through which we go through in
sadhana is necessary before we come to a stage where
the illusory ego is dissolved. We then become
intimate with the Master who as ever remains
Unknown. The paradox in spiritual life is the “Most
intimate is the Most Unknown.”
9.
The intimate moments with the Master is most
common to most of the aspirants in this system of
sadhana. Very high states of consciousness descend
into our hearts during meditation and also during
prayers. Master states that "Sometimes these things
come and go but we should grasp them and make them
permanent with us. From there you rise above." The
experience of becoming totally unknown to ourselves
is one of the feelings during meditation and almost
all those who practice the system have expressed the
same. But we do not grasp that unknown status of
ours and miss the message. It is this that I have
been pleading for when I was asking the aspirants to
own up the conditions had during meditation. Why is
it that after experiencing the state of Void or Null
during the meditation, we still keep an attitude of
love toward God or Master? Why does not the duality
get dissolved? The obvious answer is that
'I-consciousness' persists. It disappears in the
state of Samadhi or Void that we no doubt have, but
it comes back. The 'I' never disappears on its own.
It is the love for the Master or God that keeps us
anchored in our path. However the goal does not
require to be changed and our aim is to have oneness
with God and not just love for God. I have many
times wondered as to what the aspirants think of
having complete oneness with God. How many would
bargain to become Unknown. How many as Scott said
would go down to the vile dust, from whence we
sprung,
unwept, unhonoured and unsung? But only when we own
that type of experience which comes and goes, do we
really imperience the Divine. The call is there, the
experience is there and yet it is our unpreparedness
to lose our identity and become unknown by
relinquishing all our ego and identity that is the
barrier to know the unknown. The Unknown is too
intimate to be known through reason and perception;
the path is Love Him who loves all. It is in non
selfish Love that we lose our identity and we become
Unknown to ourselves. It is then we comply with what
Master is asking us to do.
10.
My humble pranams. |