Though most writers on Yoga speak abut its
efficacies, not enough has been written on the
difficulties and tribulations met with by the
sadhakas. There are undoubtedly some lucky souls
who have been able to devote themselves to one
kind of Yoga, and never had the misfortune of
having to grapple with problems of belief.
Nothing succeeds like success. A large number
of men in the modern world are not so lucky. All
of us are born into traditions built up into a
kind of system, steel-frame or otherwise equally
strong, and find that Yoga itself is an attempt
to get out of the social systems and frames, or
to use the expressive language of the vedanta,
sheaths - kosas, or wealths. All religions are
such kosas, treasuries, and bind man to them
firmly. In this world where freedom is the one
thing that matters in social and political life,
it becomes doubly necessary to enlarge the
freedom eternal, and to enlarge the goal of all
religions and spiritual endeavour. Therefore, in
the disciplines of religions, social life seem
to be perplexing and self-defeating.
Paradoxically, though, everyone insists on
conformity or obedience to the dictates of
systems of 'freedom'.
Further, there are indeed quite a number of
competitive systems, some of them promising the
freedom which the traditional religion or cult
seems to curtail, or does not deliver. Thus, in
the context of converting religions, the
conscience of man is no longer at peace with his
religious heritage or tradition form. Either he
is forced to question the foundations of his
traditions, their whys and wherefores, and seek
to verify in his own life and experience their
validity or claims, or he is made to consider
and discuss or have a dialogue with the other
claimants to his heart and mind. Therefore with
a world that has begun shrinking in size and
limits, the challenges are much more than the
mere exchange of information, or comparison of
coherencies, or degrees of acceptabilities. A
scientific decision demands the attainment of
goals which man has been fixing as ultimate and
necessary to his own perfection and realisation
or fulfilment.
However much, then, we are free in our
educational life in respect of accessibility of
contemporary and ancient material from all over
the world, the conflicts within the mind of man,
tethered to his past, are greatly disturbing.
This is one of the main difficulties in the
modern man's search for his soul, and we are
finding it difficult to gauge the depths of this
reaction.
The polytheistic worship was a difficult
enough experience to those whose goal was the
One Reality. They had either to deny the many by
accepting the one, or deny the one by accepting
the many. The dilemma posed by Advaita had
brought out one kind of difficulty whilst
solving another, namely the possibility of one
pointed devotion. The dilemma posed by Dvaita
had brought out another kind of difficulty, as
to how one could simultaneously worship or adore
many gods or manifold existence. The difficulty
is similar to that which is found in polygamous
existence. There is of course one way of
resolving this difficulty and that is to
consider that all gods are indeed the One God in
His manyness, and similarly the One God it is
who has become the many for the sake of His
devotees who are indeed many. All this is very
difficult for persons who have been shattered in
their traditional faiths, though the vasanas or
tendencies had been mutilated but not completely
served.
Thus lovers of Siva find it difficult to
shift over to the love of Vishnu, and would like
to interpret all divine forces in terms of Siva.
Similar is the case with the lovers of Vishnu.
So too with Sakti and Brahma. We have a subtle
attempt at bringing about, or building up,
hierarchies with our pet idol or God as the
highest. Some have sought to go behind these
attempts which are so well elaborated in the
different kinds of puranas - which is
traditional lore - by recourse to connotative
meanings of the names of Gods and established to
their own inner satisfaction that all names, and
therefore all works and activities and births or
incarnations of Gods or the One God, refer to
the One ultimate Being spoken of as the Reality
- Sat: "Sat eva somya idam agra asit" - "Ekam
Sat;" But all these rationalizations, or even
highly sophisticated experiences, do not go far.
Men have a strange but compelling pull back to
their sectarianisms, even as in social life men
revert back to their communalisms or casteisms
to explain away their failures, or their sense
of humiliation. This atavism - social or
religious - is no less part and parcel of the
inner life of man, as it is in biological
survival or conflict complexes. This reversion
is one of the most significant facts in racial
and communal suspicions that, today, make
religious life and political co-existence
impossible. Further, Institutions, by developing
loyalties, tie up the individual ultimately to
intolerance and misunderstandings.
Though we have all been striving for the
abolition of these subtle though thick barriers
in all our walks of life, we do not appear to
have gone at all towards the goal of a
barrierless social or religious existence. All
remain, notwithstanding human desires. I have
found that this atavism or regression to cult
and sect, caste and creed, race and place and
language, plays a very difficult role in Yoga as
in everything else. A universal consciousness
qua universal cannot recognize these
difficulties as necessary for evolution and
harmony. Further, whatever may be the truth of
each one of these and their values divested of
the five fundamentals of yama, namely adherence
to truth, non-injury, non-thieving, non-robbery
and chastity, or devotedness to the pursuit of
the Ultimate known as Brahman, they are just
hindrances and positive obstructions and sin on
the cosmic consciousness and higher than the
cosmic consciousness.
Therefore those abhyasis who are soaked in
loyalty to these traditional or environmental in
built complexes cannot but find themselves in
difficulties. The double loyalty is a great
hindrance. Therefore Gurus insist on the single
devotion and request that, during the period at
least of the sadhana, they may give a trial to
the efficacy of the non-traditional or a single
tradition, as against the multiple traditional
conformity that makes a mockery of our
devotional life.
Therefore Sri Ramchandra's Rajayoga, like the
earliest Vedic invocation, says that our loyalty
or goal must be for the Ultimate Reality.
Nothing less should be aimed at.
Further, it has been our experience that
those who seek spiritual importance or
recognition and influence usually import these
difficulties into their lives. Thus one Mr. S
who wished to appear an advanced soul when not
recognized so by the Master turned against him
and left the sadhana. Another Mr. G brought in
his own concepts of greatness and could not
accept a Master who was, regionally or by caste,
different from himself and wished to set up
himself as Master. Another Mr. K sought to
attain the Ultimate but was torn between the
traditional method of worship of icons and the
spiritual method of worship of the Supreme in
the Heart, and ended up in a serious conflict
with one of those many individuals, self styled
saviours of dharma through lectures and
orations, and other occult practices intended to
enhance worldly power and so on. Still another
Mr. T who deemed himself to be directly in touch
with the highest powers and claimed visions and
so on, found that these were not given to him by
the present practice of thoughtless and egoless
condition. He also had ambition to become a
preceptor and when denied that, turned away from
the sadhana. It is also known that many seek
entrance into new societies to meet with more
opportunities for their ego. Humility is the
essence of spiritual evolution, and any ambition
should be recognized as a hindrance to the
Ultimate realisation, because these are known by
seers to be obstacles and perversions of the
real aspiration. This is the first difficulty.
The basic fault of most seekers seems to be
this subtle obstruction proceeding from oneself
entrenching itself on traditional and other
conventions and complexes of worships and
customs.
The second source of difficulties is the lack
of siddhis (attainments) such as are exhibited
by miracles. These siddhis are said, by the Yoga
Sutras themselves, to be hindrances to the
Ultimate realisation. The usual yoga practices
sometimes lead to the awareness of one's
miraculous powers, and this, in its train,
brings into play more and more of egoism,
concealed under the name of service to humanity
and amelioration of misery of man. To be able to
give man his life, his progeny, the preservation
of his wealth or its acquisition, and health and
so on is undoubtedly a great service. So men go
to saintly men or spiritual men to gain these,
as in the opinion of the ordinary man, it is one
of the basic acquisitions of a spiritual man to
have the miraculous power to give these
necessities and needs of man.
The sadhaka therefore may find that these
miraculous powers are not exhibited by Masters
of the Sri Ramchandra's Rajayoga. And even those
who are said to have evolved or gone up the
ladder of spiritual ascent high enough do not
exhibit them.
The Yoga of the Kundalini school almost
affirms that for one who has awakened his
kundalini the power of omniscience and
omnipotence is available. Perhaps it would be
claimed that these purely Godly attributes are
inevitable acquisitions. So many seek this
attainment not for the sake of Realisation of
the Ultimate but for the sake of enjoying
sovereign power. In this sense kundalini becomes
exhausted and takes its revenge on the
individual, and forces him to realize that it is
itself a hindrance to the Ultimate. It is the
greatest force of Maya, illusion, and one should
not be tempted to play the role of the
individual egoist at cosmic and supracosmic
levels. So true is this that the Puranas and
Vedas hold that only One Person, the supreme
Purusa alone, is the Master of Maya; the rest
are bound by it, creatures deluded by it.
The supreme Nature is something that is
beyond all Maya or its rings. It is beyond all
egoisms and elements of individuation. Therefore
Sri Ramchandra's Rajayoga holds that realisation
comes when one passes beyond the Central Region
itself, which is beyond Parabrahmanda,
Brahmanda, and Pindapradesa. That is the reason
why even gods, who are masters of the Brahmanda,
are not said to be free individuals who have
realized the Ultimate, though they are very much
higher than the ordinary man yet wallowing in
the mire of the anda and pinda. Therefore also
it is said that unless even the subtlest kind of
egoism is surrendered, no further progress is
possible, and perhaps the fall from god-state is
necessary for ascent. This may be true, or else
it is just possible also that one could, with
the help of the Divine Master, go higher by
submitting himself to the Higher Absolute. This
was perhaps the meaning of the parable of the
lifting of Govardhana Giri where Indra himself
submitted to the power of Sri Krsna the avatar.
Again and again the Gods humbled themselves
before they had the Vision and access to the
Absolute.
The power-seeker is unfortunately incapable
of going beyond the levels of Brahmanda or
cosmic consciousness, even if he is such as does
not slip back into the lower level of the world.
The abhyasi seeks the Ultimate Peace and Reality
and as such the claims on his miraculous powers
for the sake of humanity cannot be satisfied or
answered. No one should attempt to answer the
demand for miracles. Sri Ram Chandra states that
these powers are there to be used when required,
and when they are not used they are not required
by the Ultimate. Though miracles are said to
qualify a person for sainthood according to some
religions, yet miracles by themselves mean
nothing at all, except as obstacles to spiritual
ascent for the individual exercising them. To
yield to popular demand in this respect is to
deviate from the path of realisation.
Impatient though man is, yet it is good for
him to learn to be patient and resigned to the
natural development that has been initiated by
the transmission of the Supreme Consciousness.
One thing seems to be axiomatic; our human
consciousness is very much a limited, and
spatially and temporally circumscribed,
consciousness. Further what is revealed by it
are related to matters of immediate concern to
life and property, and is almost helpless beyond
them. The cosmic consciousness is indeed
different. Beyond that are levels of
consciousness which might well be called by
different names, for their descriptions seem to
be inversions, or rather originals of our
inverted consciousnesses. So much so, to speak
of its powers and possibilities is beyond our
consciousness itself.
As one proceeds on the path, one transcends
the regions of light and heaviness, and attains
regions of lightness and subtle original
intuitions and insights where the light of our
comprehension fades away, leaving us naked in
the presence of the Supreme in all its Purity.
The abhorrence of isolation, or kaivalya, is
one of the characteristics of the modern age.
Man is conceived as inalienably a social being,
and society is the very condition of human or of
all existence. This social conception has
influenced man's traditional values so much that
the fact that he is an individual spirit, and
that he has a trans-social function and destiny,
are forgotten. Yoga has been accused of aiming
at Kaivalya or isolation or freedom from all
bonds, including the sangha or community. If ego
is one barrier, sangha is the other. Both could
be bonds for the man who seeks something more
valuable than either, for example, God. The
attainment of the purest state of spirituality
is called kaivalya, and not what it had later on
been considered to be, a kind of isolationism.
It is similar to the ekantabhava or ekanti-bhava
of sole and complete experience of Reality, as
it is in itself, without any kind of limitation
or subjectivity.
This experience, which goes beyond the levels
of subjectivity - knowledge, and grants direct
experience of Reality as such, is surely the
most desirable. But logical thought is incapable
of comprehending such an experience. It is real,
but if reality is only defined as that which can
be defined in logical terms of subject, object
and predicate, then such an experience
transcends the mental dialectic.
These are certain basic difficulties on the
path of yoga, much more than what usually are
considered to be obstacles of human nature,
weaknesses of man.
In fact it is one of the most important
features of spiritual life or search for yoga
that it arises from conditions of deepest
despair and depression, of weakness of heart (hrdya
daurbalyam) and helplessness (akincnata).
Surrender to the Highest Spirit or God (prapatti)
is about the most important first step towards
self-recovery and upliftment (ujjivana). It is
because it is about the most important that Yoga
itself insists that one must devote himself to
the service or attainment of God, or Isvara, so
that one may become like Him. Worshipping the
eternally free Lord of all Nature, one grows to
that state of being free and lord of all Nature,
or live according to that supreme Divine Being
and His nature. To be in conformity with that
supreme Being or Nature is to attain freedom
which is easily available. And when one attains
His condition or Him, one attains all that could
be attained through freedom and naturalness.
|